SUPERMAX: High Court to hear former Supermax MD Stanley Thai's appeal on Sept 29
What is your take on the court's decision?
Will the share price be affected by the news in 2 days time?
Should I switch to other glove stocks?
The answer lies whether you are willing to forgo the opportunity to purchase other solid and unblemished founders in glove sector eg: Top Glove, Hartalega, Kossan,etc
Introduction:
The High Court here today fixed Sept 29 to hear the appeal of former Supermax Corp Bhd group managing director Datuk Seri Stanley Thai Kim Sim and former remisier Tiong Kiong Choon who had each been sentenced to five years' jail and fined for insider trading in relation to APL Industries Bhd (APLI).
Group managing director Stanley Thai, accused of communicating non-public information about APL Industries Bhd in 2007 when he was chief executive of the firm, has appealed both the decision and sentence, Supermax said.
Reference:
Malaysia's Supermax shares slide after founder convicted of insider trading(Monday, 27 Nov 2017 02:26 PM MYT)
Shares in Malaysia's Supermax Corp Bhd, the world's No. 2 maker of rubber gloves, tumbled sharply today after its founder was convicted of insider trading concerning another company he used to head, and sentenced to five years in jail. Shares in Supermax were down 7 per cent in early afternoon trade, giving the rubber glove maker a market value of some US$314 million (RM1.29 billion) as of midday. Earlier they fell as much as 14 per cent.
https://www.malaymail.com/news/money/2017/11/27/malaysias-supermax-shares-slide-after-founder-convicted-of-insider-trading/1519501
Background:
On Nov 24, 2017, the Sessions Court here convicted Thai and Tiong of insider trading offences, according to the SC’s statement then.
The SC said Thai was sentenced to a five-year jail term and fined RM5 million, while Tiong was sentenced to five years' jail and fined RM10 million.
Insider trading offences, under Section 188 of the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007 (CMSA), carry a mandatory punishment of imprisonment not exceeding 10 years and a fine of not less than RM1 million, the SC said.
"Thai was convicted of communicating non-public information between Oct 26 and 29, 2007 to Tiong. Tiong was convicted of two counts of disposing of a total of 6.21 million (6,208,500) APLI shares while in possession of the same non-public information via accounts belonging to his mother-in-law and his mother. At the time of the commission of the offences, Tiong was also a licensed intraday trader with a stockbroking company.
"The non-public information communicated from Thai to Tiong related to the audit adjustments proposed by APLI’s auditors resulted in APLI reporting a higher loss for the financial year ended June 30, 2007, as compared to the previously reported unaudited 4Q (fourth-quarter) results for the same financial year, and that APLI would be classified as a PN17 (Practice Note 17) company. APLI made announcements to Bursa Malaysia Securities Bhd about the audit adjustments and its classification as a PN17 company on Oct 31, 2007,” the SC said.
The SC said that in passing the sentences, Sessions Court Judge Zulqarnain Hassan ruled that a deterrent sentence was warranted as insider trading offences were deemed more serious than conventional crimes, given the far-reaching effects on investors’ confidence and the public as a whole.
Justice Zulqarnain was quoted as saying in the statement: “Insider trading is a modern white-collar economic crime. It is serious and in a category or class of its own.”
According to the SC, the convictions came after a full trial where 14 witnesses testified for the prosecution, while four witnesses testified for the defence.
https://klse.i3investor.com/blogs/20200913StoryRM200Bil/2020-09-27-story-h1514331023-SUPERMAX_High_Court_to_hear_former_Supermax_MD_Stanley_Thai_s_appeal_on.jsp
